ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death worldwide. There are significant gender differences in lung cancer: most females with lung cancer are non-smokers and they are diagnosed with adenocarcinoma. Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are more effective in female lung cancer patients, but the results with gefitinib and erlotinib differ. This study compared the therapeutic response and toxicity of gefitinib and erlotinib in female lung cancer patients. Method: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical information on patients treated with gefitinib or erlotinib for more than one month at Kosin University Gospel Hospital from February 2004 to November 2007. RESULTS: Forty-two patients (26 gefitinib vs. 16 erlotinib) were enrolled during this period. Their median age was 58 years. Thirty-six patients (85%) were non-smokers and 35 patients (83%) had adenocarcinoma. There were 24% at stage IIIb and 76% at stage IV. The median survival time was 793 days. In the gefitinib group, 69% of the patients received 3rd-line chemotherapy, while 12 of 16 (87.5%) in the erlotinib group received 2nd-line chemotherapy. There were no significant differences in the overall response rate (gefitinib 39% vs. erlotinib 31%, p=0.524), median survival time (gefitinib 605 days vs. erlotinib 510 days, p=0.455), and time to progression (gefitinib 186 days vs. erlotinib 262 days, p=0.660). Rashes were more common in the erlotinib group (73.3% vs. 27%, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences in the response rate, overall survival, and time to progression between the two groups. Rashes were more common in the erlotinib group.
Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Adenocarcinoma , Exanthema , Lung , Lung Neoplasms , Protein-Tyrosine Kinases , Quinazolines , ErbB Receptors , Retrospective Studies , Erlotinib HydrochlorideABSTRACT
Hydrocarbons are a broad group of organic bodies consisting of hydrogen and carbon. They are commonly found in the environment in the form of gasoline (e.g., butane and propane) and are also used in stain removers, adhesives, lubricants, and a variety of paints. Ingestion of the compound accounts for approximately 3% of all poisoning cases in the United States, but such reports of poisoning are rare in Korea. Hydrocarbon poisoning has many adverse effects. In addition to potentially causing major damage to the respiratory and central nervous systems, direct exposure to hydrocarbons can also cause cardiac arrhythmia, hepatic dysfunction, renal failure, neuropathy, and other injuries. We present the case of a 20-year-old soldier who accidentally ingested a small amount of gasoline. He developed chemical pneumonitis, but recovered with no serious complications.
Subject(s)
Humans , Young Adult , Adhesives , Arrhythmias, Cardiac , Butanes , Carbon , Central Nervous System , Eating , Gasoline , Hydrocarbons , Hydrogen , Korea , Lubricants , Military Personnel , Paint , Pneumonia , Renal Insufficiency , United StatesABSTRACT
PURPOSE: In cases of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is the leading therapeutic modality. However, much controversy exists about the chemotherapeutic regimens and radiation methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During concurrent chemoradiotherapy, three or four cycles of gemcitabine (500 mg/m2) and cisplatin (30 mg/m2) were administered every two weeks while 50.4 Gy of irradiation was administered in 28 fractions (once/day, 5 treatment days/week) to the tumor site, mediastinum, and the involved lymph node region. In addition, a booster irradiation dose of 18 Gy in 10 fractions was administered to the primary tumor site unless the disease progressed. Two or three cycles of consolidation chemotherapy were performed with gemcitabine (1,200 mg/m2, 1st and 8th day) and cisplatin (60 mg/m2) every three weeks. RESULTS: A total of 29 patients were evaluable for modality response. Response and treatment toxicities were assessed after concurrent chemoradiotherapy and consolidation chemotherapy, respectively. One patient (4%) achieved a complete response; whereas 20 patients (69%) achieved a partial response after concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Following the consolidation chemotherapy, three patients (10.3%) achieved complete responses and 21 patients (72.4%) achieved partial responses. The median follow-up period was 20 months (range 3m39 months) and the median survival time was 16 months (95% CI; 2.4m39.2 months). The survival rates in one, two, and three years after the completion of treatment were 62.7%, 43.9%, and 20%, respectively. Complications associated to this treatment modality included grade 3 or 4 esophagitis, which occurred in 15 patients (51.7%). In addition, an incidence of 24% for grade 3 and 14% for grade 4 neutropenia. Lastly, grade 2 radiation pneumonitis occurred in 6 patients (22%). CONCLUSION: The response rate and survival time of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with biweekly gemcitabine (500 mg/m2) and cisplatin (30 mg/m2) were encouraging in patients with locally advanced NSCLC. However, treatment related toxicities were significant, indicating that further modification of therapy seems to be warranted.
Subject(s)
Incidence , Chemoradiotherapy , Lung NeoplasmsABSTRACT
Standard antituberculous therapy, including isoniazid (INH), rifampin, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide (PZA), is widely used to treat active tuberculosis. The most important side effect is hepatotoxicity. In a standard four-drug regimen, PZA was the most common cause of drug-induced hepatitis and was dose-related. The incidence of drug-induced hepatitis is high at doses of 40~70 mg/kg per day but has fallen significantly since the recommended dose was reduced. Liver toxicity induced by PZA is rare at doses of 25 mg/kg per day or less. PZA-induced fulminant hepatic failure is also rare but fatal. We report a case of fulminant hepatic failure caused by a re-challenge of PZA.